James Comey Investigated Over ‘86 47’ Instagram Post Allegedly Threatening Trump

James Comey Under Fire for Cryptic ‘86 47’ Post Allegedly Aimed at Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey is under intense scrutiny after a cryptic Instagram post sparked a formal investigation by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Secret Service. The post featured a seashell arrangement forming the numbers “86 47”—a combination many interpreted as a coded threat against former President Donald Trump.

What Does “86 47” Mean?

In American slang, “86” often implies “to eliminate” or “to get rid of”—and in some contexts, even “to kill.” The number “47” is widely believed to refer to Donald Trump, who is campaigning to become the 47th President of the United States.

The post quickly went viral, prompting Comey to delete the image and issue a public statement denying any ill intent. He emphasized his opposition to violence and clarified the message had been misunderstood.

“I never intended to issue any threat. I believe in law, due process, and peaceful discourse,” Comey stated.

Official Government Investigation

In response, both the DHS and Secret Service confirmed they are reviewing the content and intent behind Comey’s post. While Comey no longer holds an official position, his past as a high-profile FBI director has elevated the seriousness of the case.

Kash Patel, reportedly speaking in an official capacity, stated that the FBI is fully aware of the situation and is cooperating with the Secret Service in the investigation.

Public Reactions and Arrest Demands

The post triggered strong backlash from various political figures. Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard publicly demanded James Comey be arrested, claiming he deliberately used coded language recognized as a threat.

“He absolutely knew what ‘86’ meant—and to use it in reference to Trump is unacceptable,” Gabbard stated.

Others, including legal commentators and Comey supporters, called the outrage an overreaction, arguing that interpreting “86 47” as a direct threat is highly subjective and lacks legal merit without clear intent.

Legal Implications and Political Fallout

Although no formal charges have been filed yet, if authorities conclude the post was intended as a threat, Comey could face federal charges under laws prohibiting threats against public officials.

Beyond the legal realm, the situation is inflaming tensions ahead of the 2024 U.S. election, particularly given the high-profile figures involved.

Final Assessment

The “86 47” case underscores the risks of ambiguous messaging in the digital age. As a public figure, Comey is expected to communicate responsibly—especially in a time of heightened political division.

For the broader public, this incident sparks deeper questions about freedom of expression, digital symbolism, and ongoing accountability for former officials.